The miniature is in a contemporary frame which is inscribed "Percy B Shelley 1792-1822". The writing style appears to be consistent with a date of around 1825.
The miniature was acquired via a dealer who had purchased it as part of a New York collection including quality miniatures by artists such as George Engleheart. The owner of the collection had previously contacted me about a possible sale of the collection, but I advised it was too large and valuable for me to be able to contemplate making an offer. I therefore recommended a dealer who could handle the total collection.
Following this the dealer split up and sold the collection, with this miniature offered on eBay, where it was acquired for this Artists and Ancestors collection. The previous owner advised that the miniature had been acquired from a New York dealer around 1970.
That suggests it is either genuine, an artist's impression, or a portrait of another man housed in a case inscribed to Shelley. It seems unlikely that an artist would create an impression so different to the known portraits of Shelley. It also seems unlikely that a case such as this would be made and inscribed without including a portrait of Shelley. The artist is not recognisable as one of the more important artists of the early 19C, so there is little help from that aspect.
Adding to speculation is that Shelley was from a wealthy family and the commissioning of miniature portraits of family members by wealthy families was the norm in the early 19C. Hence, it is to be expected that there would have been at least one miniature portrait of Shelley as a young man.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2daa/d2daa174f5559b269f6e4be28fde1ac0837d651e" alt=""
Thus, the portrait is displayed as likely a genuine miniature of Percy Shelley, with comments welcomed from Shelley scholars. 1382
Other portraits in this collection connected to Percy Shelley include Hellen Shelley (sometimes Helen Shelley) View and Lord Byron View
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1101b/1101b9a6860d87987708152ee5afae12979ed438" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe466/fe466e73df59dec4b414b4a2b411d933584091fa" alt=""
However, her youth, the empire line dress, and her hair in the portrait are wrong for that Helen Shelley, as they date closer to 1820. Thus it is likely she is instead Hellen Shelley (1799-10 May 1885), sister of Percy Bysshe Shelley, as she appears aged about 20 in the portrait.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f18a/2f18a84a20aaad6da3a8004ab232691e58847f23" alt=""
Thomas Jefferson Hog refers to the miniature in a letter he wrote to Lady Shelley on 12 December 1857 after meeting Hellen and Margaret Shelley:
There is some thing weird about them; as there ought to be. So tall, so thin, so straight; such little round hands, such little faces, small features, & large, wild, staring eyes, like Bysshe; at once young & old, but rather young, than old! They are fit sisters for a poet & a necromancer. – The miniature is like & unlike; to common apprehensions it is like, but it does not make them look sufficiently like Enchantresses; they do not look in the portrait, as if they were able to turn you into a milk-white kid, & Percy into a statue of black marble, w.ch no doubt, they c.d do easily if they pleased.
In the 1860s, the then, Sir Percy Shelley, took a photograph of Lady Shelley and Hellen and Margaret Shelley sitting together at Boscombe. On the back of the photograph he wrote: ‘Miss Shelley (Hellen) very fair, blue eyes, and tall, very slim. Miss Margaret Shelley, deep blue eyes, dark hair, and shorter than her sister,’
It is not uncommon for family members to confuse verbally passed down family history and mix the generations when later adding a written note to a family portrait, especially where a name is repeated. The mistake can arise one or more generations either earlier or later, than depicted in a given portrait, with the error becoming apparent during research which shows the hair or costume do not fit a nominated sitter.
For example, it may be known in 1840 that a young man in a painting depicts William Bloggs (1820-1890), son of William Bloggs (1795-1860) and grandson of William Bloggs (1770-1850). But by, say 1910, the verbally passed on relationships can become mixed and the family records the sitter as the wrong William Bloggs.
In this instance, it appears the family knew it was a Helen Shelley, but later noted the wrong generation on the reverse, showing her as Helen Shelley, sister of Sir Timothy Shelley, instead as Hellen Shelley, sister of Percy Shelley.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b01/78b012395abf3d3fdc6df02303f41c2fe288a6c4" alt=""
As a result of fresh research it has been possible to show Byron was related by marriage to Sir Anthony Carlisle. The stepmother of Carlisle's wife Martha, Anne Trevanion, being widow of Byron's great uncle, William Trevanion. This relationship had not previously been noted by Byron scholars.
It is an important relationship, although only a minor aspect in a comprehensive case demonstrating that Carlisle's research into reviving the recently deceased was inspiration for Mary Shelley's Victor Frankenstein, in her famous novel Frankenstein.
3 comments:
I've been collecting and studying images of P.S. for quite some time. Although initially ruling your portrait out I am now wondering if it could actually be authentic. There is an ink wash of Shelley (Getty Images) that is not often seen. Described as 'early 19th century', unknown artist. I find it exceptionally similar in dress and hairstyle to this little miniature. Both wear 'Brutus' type hairstyles...forward-combed, curly, quite dark. The curliness could be because of youth, or because of the short style. On both the eyebrows are pronounced and dark. The style of dress is almost identical, very high, wrapped stock, and very similar jacket. Both are unusually formal for what we think of as Shelley. On both the nose inclines slightly up rather than down as shown in many other images (but this could be because of the angle chosen). I am very intrigued.
I've been collecting and studying images of P.S. for quite some time. Although initially ruling your portrait out I am now wondering if it could actually be authentic. There is an ink wash of Shelley (Getty Images) that is not often seen. Described as 'early 19th century', unknown artist. I find it exceptionally similar in dress and hairstyle to this little miniature. Both wear 'Brutus' type hairstyles...forward-combed, curly, quite dark. The curliness could be because of youth, or because of the short style. On both the eyebrows are pronounced and dark. The style of dress is almost identical, very high, wrapped stock, and very similar jacket. Both are unusually formal for what we think of as Shelley. On both the nose inclines slightly up rather than down as shown in many other images (but this could be because of the angle chosen). I am very intrigued.
The ink wash is by Edwin Beyerhaus (Beyerhaus after Clint, supposedly), and can be found on Artstor.org. I'd love this cameo to be another depiction of the two we have of Shelley, but it really is far too black haired.
Post a Comment